July 2017 in Review
July
20 books read. 11 by women (55%), 8 by men (40%), 1 by NB (5%)
Works by POC: 7 (35%)
Year to Date
146 works reviewed. 79 by women (54%). 63 by men (43%). 4 by non-binary authors (3%).
Works by POC: 46.5 (32%)
And now, the meaningless table.
Key: WNB stands for “women and non-binary genders”, while POC stands for “person of colour”. R/R stands for “reviews/reviewers”. For R/R the percentage represents the site’s R/R over my 2015 R/R. SFX is actually called SFX; it is not short for anything. Same with io9. F&SF is the Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction. SFS is Science Fiction Studies. LARB is the Los Angeles Review of Books. CSZ is the Cascadia Subduction Zone.
Review source | Total | WNB | WNB % | POC | POC % | Reviewers | R/R | R/R % |
JNR 2015 | 329 | 195 | 59 | 45 | 14 | 1 | 329 | 100 |
Locus | 324 | 163 | 50 | 22 | 7 | 17 | 19 | 5.7 |
JNR 2016 | 255 | 163.5 | 64 | 62.5 | 25 | 1 | 255 | 78 |
SFX | 165 | 48 | 29 | 10 | 6 | 30 | 5.5 | 1.5 |
Romantic Times | 146 | 84 | 57 | 14 | 10 | (incorrect) | n/a | N/a |
JNR 2017 | 146 | 83 | 57 | 46.5 | 32 | 1 | 146 | 44.4 |
Tor | 141 | 66 | 47 | 18 | 13 | 27 | 5.2 | 1.6 |
Strange Horizons | 139 | 66 | 48 | 30 | 22 | 80 | 1.7 | 0.5 |
Rising Shadows | 83 | 25 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 41.5 | 12.6 |
Interzone | 67 | 21 | 31 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 3.5 | 1 |
F&SF | 59 | 32 | 54 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 11.8 | 3.6 |
Analog | 58 | 10 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 58 | 17.6 |
Io9 | 56 | 17 | 30 | 12 | 21 | 10 | 5.6 | 1.7 |
Asimov’s | 53 | 21 | 23 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 17.7 | 5.4 |
Vector | 52 | 18 | 35 | 4 | 8 | 26 | 2 | 0.6 |
SFS | 45 | 48 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 38 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
NYRSF | 42 | 11 | 26 | 6 | 13 | 24 | 1.8 | 0.5 |
Foundation | 38 | 9 | 24 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
LARB | 35 | 11 | 31 | 7 | 20 | 28 | 1.3 | 0.4 |
Lightspeed | 28 | 16? | 57 | 14 | 50 | 3 | 9.3 | 2.8 |
CSZ | 23 | 19 | 80 | 8 | 35 | 17 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
I am making progress on the non-binary front but only in terms of books. In terms of authors, I am still narrow focus. I've read more books by POC than this time last year (46.5 versus 34) but fiddling about with numbers says at 4 or 5 books by POC I will only have reviewed 66 to 71 books by POC by the end of December. The low end is not significantly better than 2016. It's a good thing I am neither competitive nor obsessed with my statistics.
At 20 books a month, by year's end I will probably edge out everyone but Locus' army of reviewers, in terms of total reviews. Ah, well. And Locus will have reviewed slightly more WNB authors than I will by years end. At least I can console myself that I am about 27 times as productive thus far as the median reviewer is in a year.